A Poem.

Edit: I realized I used a semicolon, which according to Vonnegut are "transvestite hermaphrodites representing absolutely nothing. All they do is show you've been to college." Oops.

________________________

So I was planning to write everyday... We see how well that worked out.

Anyway, I have a poem for you today; it came in my Writer's Almanac (available for free subscription from APM at http://writersalmanac.publicradio.org/)

This is "Windows is Shutting Down" by Clive James

Windows is shutting down, and grammar are
On their last leg. So what am we to do?
A letter of complaint go just so far, 
Proving the only one in step are you.

Better, perhaps, to simply let it goes.
A sentence have to be screwed pretty bad
Before they gets to where you doesnt knows
The meaning what it must be meant to had.

The meteor have hit. Extinction spread,
But evolution do not stop for that.
A mutant languages rise from the dead
And all them rules is suddenly old hat.

Too bad for we, us what has had so long
The best seat from the only game in town.
But there it am, and whom can say its wrong?
Those are the break. Windows is shutting down.

Be well, do good work, and keep in touch (thanks GK).

UGA Alert

At UGA, there's a system called UGAAlert, the purpose of which is to alert students (creative name, no?) when an event has occurred on campus that is abnormal and could be dangerous. So my question to UGA police (the party responsible for this system's use) is this: Why is UGAAlert not used when there's actually something that could cause trouble on campus?

Yesterday, UGA students and faculty got an email from UGAAlert sometime in the morning (I don't remember the exact time - I deleted the email) explaining that the NIGHT BEFORE, two men had attempted an armed robbery on a student on North Campus. The whole point of this system is to alert students and staff to a potentially dangerous situation. Bearing that in mind, isn't an armed robbery a dangerous situation? If the system is not used within certain time from the event, say, within an hour, then why use it at all?

Given the one example, you might think I'm overreacting. But a similar event occurred last year, where a man ran through the area between Brumby Hall and the West Deck, and then proceeded through the Creswell common area (indoors!) brandishing a gun. To the UGAPD's credit, on this occasion, they did at least send the alert the same day, albeit between four and five hours later.

Another instance that also occurred last year was a bomb threat in the SLC. Both of the other events I've written about occurred in the evening, a time when there are far fewer students out and about. This particular event, however, disrupted my 9:05 psychology class. The SLC was closed for quite a few hours after that. You'd think (or at least I would) that this event in particular would warrant use of the alert. Instead, UGAPD ended up, because of the non-use of their alert system, with thousands of uninformed students milling about outside the SLC (within a hypothetical blast zone had a bomb actually gone off), and not knowing the danger that they were in simply by standing outside with classmates.

UGAAlert is not used AT ALL in actual emergency situations, but they have no problem sending five or ten messages in the event of  the possibility of severe weather. I'm not saying that using the system when there's a tornado watch is wrong, but in the recent weather situation in ACC, the alert system sent two messages each for the beginning and the end of the tornado watch and subsequent warning (eight messages total), which I think dilutes the purpose of the system substantially.

My entire point here is that if the University police send that many messages about a potential weather system, it would make sense to alert students when they're in danger from another source. In the events I described, the UGAAlert system was either not used at all (in the bomb threat), or not used until the threat had been isolated (robbery) and the responsible party apprehended (gun-brandishing). 

Thoughts?

First post

I'm new to this site. I was introduced by my Sociology professor, and I thought that this would be a good outlet for my (in)sane observations about our culture and society. I chose the title "Man Without a Country" to pay homage to Kurt Vonnegut, the best American writer of the 20th (and a short time in the 21st) century.

Don't you think it's funny to watch people on a crowded bus? UGA's buses are generally fairly crowded, and I always like to observe people when they're crammed into an Orbit bus at three in the afternoon. 

The funniest people to observe are the socialites on their cell phones. These people have seemingly no idea that everyone on the entire bus can hear their conversations. The best ones are those describing last night's venture downtown, most of which they don't actually remember. The other day, I heard one person insisting that he hadn't done something (I wasn't able to determine what the something was; it was never said on our end) the previous night. Regardless of whether he had or hadn't done this deed, I found it hilarious that at least one party on the phone was having such difficulty knowing what had actually occurred. I can honestly say that I have never not known what I did after any sort of outing, be it a party, race, football game, or anything else.

Another funny thing to watch is the people who have to stand in the aisle and hold the grab bars. As soon as the bus starts moving, you can tell which people have been riding the buses for a while, and which ones have clearly just started. The best of the second category actually manage to stand the whole time with minimal "Oh crap" moments, while the even less-experienced tend to fall over, which is great for watching, but not so great for the faller.